• Home
  • About
    • Authors
  • Advertise
  • Right To Bear
  • Articles
    • Leadership
    • Tactics
    • Officer Down
    • Editorial
    • Op-ed
    • Chaplain
    • News
  • Network
    • Learn more
  • Training
  • Contact
No Result
View All Result
Law Officer
Law Officer
No Result
View All Result

SCOTUS denies request to halt construction of border wall

Several groups tried to impede the wall construction over environmental concerns

border wall
August 1, 2020
Law Officerby Law Officer
Share and speak up for justice, law & order...

WASHINGTON — By a narrow 5-4 margin, the U.S. Supreme Court has denied a request to halt construction of President Trump’s border wall over environmental concerns.

A number of groups, including the ACLU and Sierra Club, had asked the high court to get involved again after the justices last year cleared the way for the administration to use military funds for construction while the case played out in the courts, Fox News reported.

The four liberal justices dissented from Friday’s order.

A federal appeals court had ruled against the Trump administration last month, but the justices, for now, have given another temporary victory to the president.

In June, the Supreme Court also declined to hear an appeal from a coalition of environmental groups that pushed back against the Trump administration’s construction of the wall along the U.S.-Mexico border.

The groups, led by the Center for Biological Diversity, challenged a 1996 law giving the president authority to fight illegal immigration and border crossings, and limiting some legal challenges.

The coalition claimed that the Trump administration did not conduct sufficient environmental impact studies for the construction and that endangered species like the jaguar and Mexican wolf would be adversely affected by the barrier, Fox reported.

They had asserted in their case that the law’s allowance for the secretary of Homeland Security to waive any laws necessary to allow the quick construction of border fencing violates the Constitution’s separation of powers. The D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals had dismissed the case, citing a prior case from 2007 with “a nearly identical context.”

“This Court finds that precedent persuasive, and it compels the conclusion that Plaintiffs’ complaint fails to state plausible constitutional claims as a matter of law,” the Circuit Court’s ruling said.

Concerns about environmental impact would seem to be a pretext for the ACLU to challenge construction based upon a statement from one of their attorney’s.

“The fight continues,” said Dror Ladin, a staff attorney with the ACLU’s National Security Project. “Every lower court to consider the question has ruled President Trump’s border wall illegal, and the Supreme Court’s temporary order does not decide the case. We’ll be back before the Supreme Court soon to put a stop to Trump’s xenophobic border wall once and for all.”

 


Share and speak up for justice, law & order...
Tags: acluborder wallPresident TrumpSCOTUSSierra Clubsupreme court
Law Officer

Law Officer

Law Officer is the only major law enforcement publication and website owned and operated by law enforcement—for law enforcement and supporters of justice, law, and order. This unique facet makes Law Officer much more than just a publishing company, but a true advocate for the law enforcement profession.

Related Posts

Donald Trump

SCOTUS rules unanimously Trump can’t be removed from Colorado ballot

March 4, 2024
Texas defies SCOTUS

Texas defies SCOTUS ruling and the Biden Administration as they continue to roll out border defenses

January 24, 2024
SCOTUS

Minnesota urges SCOTUS to let Biden admin facilitate Big Tech censorship

January 8, 2024
Jose Garza

Floundering Prosecutors Failing

November 24, 2023
Derek Chauvin

SCOTUS refuses to hear Derek Chauvin appeal

November 20, 2023
Guardian Plan

Judge orders State of New York to pay $447K to NRA following Supreme Court victory

October 2, 2023
Load More

Latest Articles

houston police officers stabbed

When “Unacceptable” Isn’t Enough

June 11, 2026
d-day

D-Day, Protectors, And The Enduring Chords Of Service

June 4, 2026
Vincent J. Bove addressing members of the NYPD Strategic Response Group (SRG) during roll call presentations in Manhattan on May 26, 2026. The SRG represents one of the NYPD’s most operationally demanding assignments, responsible for tactical readiness, major event security, counterterrorism support, and rapid response operations throughout New York City. (Credit: Police Officer Emir Aliaj / NYPD Strategic Response Group for Reawakening America LLC)

From NYPD SRG to Harlem’s 32nd Precinct: A Day Across the Front Lines of New York

June 2, 2026
FBI National Command

Forging Small-Agency Executives: Inside the FBI National Command Course

June 2, 2026
Brian O'Hara

BREAKING: Minneapolis Police Chief Brian O’Hara resigns

May 26, 2026
21st century policing

Preserving the Dignity of the Badge in 21st Century Policing

May 26, 2026
Load More

Weekly E-Newsletter

Subscribe—and get the latest news and editorials direct from Law Officer each week!

[newsletter_form type="minimal"]

BE COURAGEOUS

JOIN THE FIGHT

Protect Your Privacy

POPULAR GEAR

Tactical Pants

Tactical Boots

 

FIND MORE…

Law Officer

© 2024 LawOfficer.com

LawOfficer.com

  • Home
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Corrections
  • Contact

Speak up for justice, law & order

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About
    • Authors
  • Advertise
  • Right To Bear
  • Articles
    • Leadership
    • Tactics
    • Officer Down
    • Editorial
    • Op-ed
    • Chaplain
    • News
  • Network
    • Learn more
  • Training
  • Contact

© 2024 LawOfficer.com