• Home
  • About
    • Authors
  • Advertise
  • Articles
    • Archives
    • Chaplain
    • Crime & Controversy
    • Community
    • Cop Humor
    • Editorial
    • Op-ed
    • Gear & Technology
    • Investigations
    • Laws & Legal
    • Leadership
    • News
    • Officer Down
    • On Duty
    • Tactics
  • Network
    • Learn more
  • Training
  • Officer Privacy
  • Jobs
  • Contact
No Result
View All Result
Law Officer
Law Officer
No Result
View All Result

An Important Opportunity to Reaffirm Qualified Immunity

Qualified Immunity

Maryland State House (Wikipedia Commons)

May 13, 2022
Dave SmithbyDave Smith
Share and speak up for justice, law & order...

“Henceforth, government officials performing discretionary functions generally are shielded from liability for civil damages insofar as their conduct does not violate ‘clearly established’ statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have known. “

– Harlow v. Fitzgerald, 1982

 

One of the big anti-police actions of late has been the assault on qualified immunity for law enforcement.  Qualified immunity is simply the protection afforded to public officials who make discretionary decisions in novel situations so that, if even if they make a mistake or engage in unpopular decision making, they are protected legally. “Discretionary” simply means left to an individual’s choice of judgment, not fixed rules, and today’s militants demand law enforcement lose that right in favor of…what? That every action be mandatory?

Recently, the National Police Association entered a case as a friend of the court filing an amicus brief in support of qualified immunity in Maryland. This is one of a series of filings they have made to encourage the Federal Courts to remember key authorities necessary for police to control those who break the law while otherwise also exercising protected First Amendment rights. It would appear in recent rulings the rights of protestors/rioters have been considered sacrosanct while law enforcement efforts to control them have been ruled excessive. In this particular case, Hulbert v. Pope, the Hulbert brothers have sued Sgt. Pope for violation of their First Amendment rights by arresting them while protesting on the sidewalk of the State House in Annapolis, Maryland. I note that in the government complex area around the state capitol there is an area called “Lawyer’s Mall” specifically designated for people to protest, while the sidewalks around the complex are alternatively selected for walking and standing — not protesting. This seems a reasonable compromise for First Amendment protections and thus far has not been deemed unconstitutional by the courts. Thus, the Hulberts were in clear statutory violation of the law when Sgt. Pope asked them to move their protest from the sidewalk and they refused. While one brother was being arrested, the other brother engaged in what has become known as a ”First Amendment Audit” by recording the event. Eventually, that brother, too, was arrested, and the video went viral on social media. While doing a press conference the following day, the brothers were delivered additional citations by none other than Colonel Wilson, chief of the Maryland Capitol Police!

This might very well have been the end of the story: protestors violate the law, get cited, move on, and go back to protesting. But in this day and age, no such thing happened. In today’s climate, we find the brothers Hulbert sued Sgt. Pope and Col. Wilson claiming their First and Fourth Amendment rights had been violated, claiming false arrest, false imprisonment, and excessive force. The sergeant and his chief answered the suit stating the complaints were false.

For an official to have qualified immunity they need to prove two things: First, “Qualified immunity shields government officials from civil damages liability so long as their conduct ‘does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have known.” Second, “the court determines whether the right at issue was clearly established at the time of the defendants’ conduct.” Mendes v. Wendling.

When reading the final ruling it seems the court was preoccupied with many questions but the most basic of all was essentially ignored. Here it is. Are you ready? Was the offended party committing a crime when the official action occurred? The simple reality is, that the First Amendment rights of Assembly and Protest are protected but breaking the law is not. The ruling in this case was Sgt. Pope’s case was not dismissed and the suit against him can continue. Sgt. Pope has appealed the decision to the Fourth Circuit.

One of the key issues in this case is the unique nature of the property around the Maryland capitol. There is a specific location for protest, Lawyer’s Mall, and specific laws about the sidewalk that Sgt. Pope was enforcing.

The Hulberts were pro-gun rights activists and sympathy or antipathy for their cause is not the issue here. Sgt. Pope did not tell them to stop their advocacy, simply move to the mall a few yards away. To show the mindset of the protesting siblings, the other protestors moved, but the Hulberts stayed in defiance of the lawful order and began to record the events that followed.

This kind of “auditing” of the police has become more and more popular in recent years with advocates and “auditors” often committing misdemeanors to create videos of their interaction with the police to instigate and intimidate. This is a dangerous trend and some jurisdictions have even passed legislation to limit these actions. The balance between rights and law enforcement necessity is something that still needs to be resolved but discouraging this “auditing” is something the courts and legislatures need to deal with more effectively.

This last point is mentioned in the National Police Association’s amicus brief as it shows the mindset of the brothers arrested in this case. This is also an issue administrators need to address with a policy to help officers deal with this growing trend.

I will watch the appeal in this case and certainly hope the court corrects the current ruling limiting qualified immunity for Sgt. Pope. He used his discretion properly, did not violate the rights of the protesters, and should be covered by qualified immunity. For all you current law enforcement officers, find out the status of qualified immunity in your State and jurisdiction, understand what it is really all about, and hope groups like the National Police Association keep fighting on your behalf!


Share and speak up for justice, law & order...
Tags: Maryland State Housemust-readNational Police Associationqualified immunity
Dave Smith

Dave Smith

Former police lieutenant Dave Smith is an internationally known speaker, writer and law enforcement expert. Dave completed his college degree at the University of Arizona while fighting forest fires with the “Coconino Hot Shots” and then began his police career with the Tucson Police Department. In 1978 he joined the Arizona Department of Public Safety, holding positions in Patrol, SWAT, Narcotics, Training and Management. In 1980 he developed the popular "JD Buck Savage" video training series, was the lead instructor for the Calibre Press "Street Survival" seminar from 1983 to 1985, and was instrumental in developing Calibre's timeless "Tactical Edge" officer survival book. Dave holds numerous instructor certifications in firearms, defensive tactics, and human performance and is a proven expert witness and consultant.  In 1989, Dave joined the Law Enforcement Television Network (LETN), developing and hosting cutting-edge police, security and public safety training as its Director of Education and was the general manager of Calibre Press until January of 2002. Dave continued to instruct the “Street Survival” seminar through 2012 as its senior instructor, managing the most comprehensive update to the seminar since 2003.  Dave has authored hundreds of articles for publications including Police Chief, Law and Order, The Trainer, Police Marksman, the Calibre Press Newsline, PoliceOne, Officer.com, Law Officer and POLICE magazine.  Dave was the Director of Video Training for the online Police One Academy and both produced and hosted PoliceOne’s award winning “Roll Call Reality Training” segments. He currently trains through Arizona-based “Winning Mind LLC,” is a regular columnist for POLICE magazine, the author of the popular book In My Sights and is a frequent media analyst concerning law enforcement issues.  Dave can be reached via his website at www.jdbucksavage.com or on his Facebook fan page as “JD Buck Savage.”  

Related Posts

National Police Association

The National Police Association Asks Supreme Court to Reverse Dangerous New Officer Liability

June 28, 2024
National Police Association

The National Police Association Urges Congress to Pass the Housing for Heroes Act of 2023

January 24, 2024
household dispute

Household Dispute v Qualified Immunity

January 8, 2024
National Police Association

The National Police Association Urges Congress to Pass the Local Law Enforcement Protection Act

November 21, 2023

‘Media Day’ Invites Journos to Experience Police Work

June 10, 2023
nashville

The National Police Association Files Suit to Obtain the Nashville Shooter ‘Manifesto’

April 29, 2023
Load More

Latest Articles

The Problem with Promotions

June 20, 2025
Melissa Hortman

Former Minnesota House Speaker Assassinated in Attack on Multiple Lawmakers

June 14, 2025

Sheriff: If You Throw a Brick At Our Deputy, ‘We Will Kill You, Graveyard Dead’

June 13, 2025

Former USAID Officer and Executives Plead Guilty in $550 Million Bribery Scheme

June 13, 2025

A Case Study in Federal Corruption and Media Silence

June 12, 2025

‘Completely blew it’: Former union president calls out Minneapolis Police Department leadership missteps

June 12, 2025
Load More

Weekly E-Newsletter

Subscribe—and get the latest news and editorials direct from Law Officer each week!

[newsletter_form type="minimal"]

Protect Your Privacy

JOIN THE FIGHT

BE COURAGEOUS

POPULAR GEAR

Tactical Pants

Tactical Boots

 

FIND MORE…

Law Officer

© 2024 LawOfficer.com

LawOfficer.com

  • Home
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Corrections
  • Contact

Speak up for justice, law & order

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About
    • Authors
  • Advertise
  • Articles
    • Archives
    • Chaplain
    • Crime & Controversy
    • Community
    • Cop Humor
    • Editorial
    • Op-ed
    • Gear & Technology
    • Investigations
    • Laws & Legal
    • Leadership
    • News
    • Officer Down
    • On Duty
    • Tactics
  • Network
    • Learn more
  • Training
  • Officer Privacy
  • Jobs
  • Contact

© 2024 LawOfficer.com